CookieBanner.co.uk · Public Visibility Review

Reilly & Co Solicitors Cookie Notice & Privacy Signals Review

A public review of visible cookie controls, policy information and public data-collection signals on the Reilly & Co Solicitors website.

Checked

27 June 2026

Review type

Fresh-Visitor Public Check

Scope

Visible Public Signals

52out of 100

Detailed tracking information, but limited first-layer visitor choice

The public Cookie Policy explains that cookies can identify and track web browsers, lists Google Analytics cookies and refers to third-party technologies such as advertising networks, social platforms, maps and video services. The visible first-layer notice presents a single “I accept” action and states that use of the website amounts to agreement. A useful improvement would be clear first-layer choices for accepting, rejecting or managing non-essential technologies.

Technical tag behaviour not tested

Privacy information

20 / 25

Public Privacy Policy, Cookie & Privacy Policy, terms, complaints and pricing information were identified.

Cookie choices

4 / 25

The visible first layer presents an “I accept” action. A similarly visible Reject All or settings route was not identified.

Cookie information

14 / 15

The policy describes session cookies, Google Analytics, third-party cookies and browser-tracking purposes.

Form transparency

10 / 15

Public Privacy Policy explains website personal-data collection and includes a data-protection contact route.

Choice persistence

4 / 20

A visible website route to revisit, amend or withdraw a cookie choice was not identified in this public check.

Why the score is 52, not a compliance verdict
This score reflects visible public evidence only. It gives credit for clear cookie-policy information, separate privacy information and transparency about Google Analytics and third-party cookies. Points are held back because the fresh-visitor notice presents only an acceptance action and use-based agreement wording, while a similarly visible reject route, preference centre and route to revisit a choice were not identified. It is not a legal conclusion.
What was directly visible in this check
The homepage displays a notice stating that cookies are used to provide the best online experience and that use of the website amounts to agreement with the Cookie Policy, alongside an “I accept” action. The Cookie Policy explains that cookies enable web servers to identify and track browsers. It lists Google Analytics cookies, explains that Google Analytics is used to analyse website use, and refers to third-party cookies from services including advertising networks, web-traffic-analysis services, Twitter, Facebook, Google Maps and YouTube.
What this check did not test
This public check did not inspect browser storage, cookie values, network requests, tag-manager settings, analytics requests, advertising pixels or Consent Mode behaviour. It did not determine whether Google Analytics or third-party technologies are technically prevented from loading before a visitor interaction, whether any hidden settings route exists, or whether a cookie preference can be withdrawn after acceptance.
Important: This is a Public Visibility & Transparency Score based on observed public evidence. It is not a GDPR, PECR, legal or formal compliance score, and it does not determine how scripts, cookies, pixels or tags operate in every consent state.

Review findings

Visible Consent and Privacy Signals

Cookie Notice

  • Visible first-layer cookie notice identified
  • Single “I accept” action identified
  • Notice says website use amounts to agreement with the Cookie Policy
  • Separate first-layer Reject All option was not identified
  • Visible settings or customisation route was not identified

The public notice gives visitors information and an acceptance action. A clearer first layer would allow visitors to accept, reject or manage non-essential cookies without relying on browser-level settings.

Cookie & Privacy Information

  • Cookie Policy explains browser identification and tracking
  • Session and persistent cookies are distinguished
  • Google Analytics cookies are listed
  • Website-use analysis is described
  • Third-party cookies are discussed, including analytics and targeting technologies

The Cookie Policy contains useful tracking information. The practical review point is whether the live banner and technical behaviour give visitors a clear, upfront choice before non-essential analytics and third-party technologies operate.

Public Data Collection

  • Public Privacy Policy is available
  • Policy identifies website personal-data collection
  • Names, contact details and submitted information are described
  • Data-protection contact details are published
  • Third-party services are identified in the Privacy Policy

This review does not assess live form configuration, backend processing, retention, access controls, lawful basis or client-file data handling.

Evidence matrix

Observed Evidence and Review Boundaries

Review areaWhat was observedReview statusNot determined by this check
Cookie messageFirst-layer notice with an “I accept” action and use-based agreement wording.ObservedWhether the notice behaves identically on all devices, browsers and visitor journeys.
Visitor choiceA visible Reject All, customisation or preference-centre route was not identified in the public journey reviewed.Not identifiedWhether an undiscovered or context-specific settings route is available elsewhere on the website.
Cookie informationCookie Policy describes browser tracking, Google Analytics, session cookies and third-party cookies.ObservedWhether every technology currently operating on the website is reflected in the policy.
Privacy informationPublic Privacy Policy identifies data collection, rights and a data-protection contact route.ObservedAccuracy, legal adequacy or completeness of all policy information.
Cookies and tagsNot technically inspected in this public visibility review.Not testedCookies, browser storage, network requests, Google Analytics behaviour, advertising technologies, third-party scripts or Consent Mode behaviour.

What a Deeper Review Would Check

The public policy is detailed, but it does not establish what happens in a clean browser before a visitor interacts with the notice. A technical review would compare cookies, browser storage, network requests and visible changes before interaction, after the acceptance action and after any available browser or site-level cookie controls.

Because the Cookie Policy identifies Google Analytics and third-party cookies from analytics, advertising, social, map and video services, the practical technical question is whether non-essential technologies are blocked until a valid visitor choice is recorded.

Suggested technical scope

  • Clean-browser baseline
  • Cookie and browser-storage review
  • Network-request and tag-firing review
  • First-layer notice review
  • Google Analytics review
  • Third-party technology review
  • Cookie-policy versus live-site comparison
  • Developer-ready action list

Request an Update or Correction

Reilly & Co Solicitors, or someone authorised to act for the business, may submit evidence that this review is inaccurate, incomplete or out of date. We will consider relevant information and update the page where appropriate.

Factual corrections and updates are not conditional on purchasing any service.

For other website owners

Need a similar review?

Run a free WordPress CookieBanner Check or request a detailed technical review of consent controls, tracking tags and policy signals.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *