CookieBanner.co.uk · Public Visibility Review

ITN Solicitors Cookie Notice & Privacy Signals Review

A public review of visible cookie controls, privacy information and public data-collection signals on the ITN Solicitors website.

Checked

27 June 2026

Review type

Fresh-Visitor Public Check

Scope

Visible Public Signals

80out of 100

Accessible cookie settings, with a remaining first-layer choice check

The public website presents an “Accept All Cookies” route alongside “Cookies Settings” and a Privacy Preference Center. The settings content separates Strictly Necessary Cookies from Performance Cookies. This provides a visible route to understand and manage cookies without relying solely on the longer Privacy Policy. The remaining public review point is whether visitors can reject non-essential cookies as easily as they can accept them, and whether settings can be reopened after a choice is saved.

Technical tag behaviour not tested

Privacy information

23 / 25

A detailed public Privacy Policy identifies the firm as controller, explains data rights and gives a data-protection contact route.

Cookie choices

18 / 25

Accept All Cookies and a settings route were identified. A one-click Reject All route was not confirmed in this public review.

Cookie information

14 / 15

The preference panel identifies strictly necessary cookies and a separate performance-cookie category.

Form transparency

10 / 15

Public contact forms request name, email, phone, legal service and enquiry details, with Privacy Policy information available.

Choice persistence

15 / 20

Cookies Settings and a Privacy Preference Center were identified, but post-choice saving and reopening behaviour was not fully tested.

Why the score is 80, not a compliance verdict
This score reflects visible public evidence only. It gives credit for a detailed Privacy Policy, an accessible cookie settings route, a visible Privacy Preference Center and separation between strictly necessary and performance cookies. Points are held back because this review did not confirm a one-click Reject All option, the complete category list, the save behaviour of individual settings or the permanent route for reopening preferences after a choice. It is not a legal conclusion.
What was directly visible in this check
The public website exposes “Accept All Cookies”, “Cookies Settings” and a Privacy Preference Center. The preference content identifies Strictly Necessary Cookies as Always Active and separately refers to Performance Cookies. ITN Solicitors’ public Privacy Policy states that the website uses cookies and refers visitors to a separate cookie policy. Public enquiry fields include full name, email address, phone, legal service and enquiry details.
What this check did not test
This public check did not inspect browser storage, cookie values, network requests, tag-manager settings, analytics requests, advertising pixels or Consent Mode behaviour. It did not determine whether performance cookies or other non-essential technologies are technically prevented from loading before a preference is saved, whether a one-click reject route is available in all visitor journeys, or whether visitors can reopen and amend a completed choice throughout the website.
Important: This is a Public Visibility & Transparency Score based on observed public evidence. It is not a GDPR, PECR, legal or formal compliance score, and it does not determine how scripts, cookies, pixels or tags operate in every consent state.

Review findings

Visible Consent and Privacy Signals

Cookie Notice

  • Visible “Accept All Cookies” route identified
  • Visible “Cookies Settings” route identified
  • Privacy Preference Center identified
  • Strictly Necessary Cookies shown as Always Active
  • One-click Reject All route not confirmed in this public review

The visible consent setup gives visitors a route to manage cookie preferences. A further visitor-journey check would confirm whether rejecting non-essential cookies is as direct as accepting all cookies.

Cookie & Privacy Information

  • Privacy Policy identifies ITN Solicitors as data controller
  • Website cookie use is acknowledged in the Privacy Policy
  • Separate Cookie Policy is referenced
  • Strictly Necessary and Performance Cookie categories are visible
  • Privacy Preference Center is publicly identified

The public routes make cookie information easier to find than embedding all cookie wording inside a long privacy notice. The current operational effect of each setting was not technically tested.

Public Data Collection

  • Public enquiry form requests full name, email, phone and enquiry details
  • Visitors select a relevant legal service in the public form
  • Privacy Policy explains the firm’s data-controller role
  • Data-protection contact information is publicly available
  • Privacy Policy explains individual data rights and complaint routes

This review does not assess backend form configuration, data retention, lawful basis, security arrangements, access controls or client-case processing.

Evidence matrix

Observed Evidence and Review Boundaries

Review areaWhat was observedReview statusNot determined by this check
Cookie messagePublic consent component referring to Accept All Cookies, Cookies Settings and a Privacy Preference Center.ObservedWhether all controls appear identically across devices, browsers and visitor journeys.
Visitor choiceStrictly Necessary Cookies are shown as Always Active and Performance Cookies are separately identified.ObservedWhether a one-click Reject All option is available, default states for all categories and the effect of saving preferences.
Cookie informationPrivacy Policy acknowledges website cookies and refers to a separate Cookie Policy.ObservedWhether every technology operating on the live website is reflected in the visible policy and preference content.
Privacy informationDetailed public Privacy Policy explains controller status, data rights and a data-protection contact route.ObservedAccuracy, legal adequacy or completeness of the policy information.
Public formsPublic enquiry form requests name, email, phone, legal-service choice and enquiry details.ObservedBackend data handling, retention, security, lawful basis or client-case processing.
Cookies and tagsNot technically inspected in this public visibility review.Not testedCookies, browser storage, network requests, analytics requests, advertising technologies, third-party scripts or Consent Mode behaviour.

What a Deeper Review Would Check

The public interface gives visitors a visible settings route, but it does not establish exactly what happens in a clean browser before and after a visitor makes a selection. A technical review would compare cookies, browser storage, network requests and visible page changes before interaction, after accepting all cookies and after adjusting individual cookie categories.

The practical review point is whether performance and other non-essential technologies remain inactive until the appropriate preference is saved, whether visitors can reject non-essential cookies without additional friction and whether settings can be reopened throughout the site.

Suggested technical scope

  • Clean-browser baseline
  • Cookie and browser-storage review
  • Network-request and tag-firing review
  • Accept-all versus category-choice comparison
  • Preference-panel default-state review
  • Reject-route and save-action review
  • Cookie-settings re-open route review
  • Developer-ready action list

Request an Update or Correction

ITN Solicitors, or someone authorised to act for the business, may submit evidence that this review is inaccurate, incomplete or out of date. We will consider relevant information and update the page where appropriate.

Factual corrections and updates are not conditional on purchasing any service.

For other website owners

Need a similar review?

Run a free WordPress CookieBanner Check or request a detailed technical review of consent controls, tracking tags and policy signals.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *