May 2026 Cookie Banner Review: 25 UK PPC & SEO Websites

May 2026 Cookie Banner Review — 25 PPC & SEO Companies

Independent technical review of cookie banner wording, visitor consent controls, cookie categorisation, policy clarity and tracking transparency across PPC, SEO and digital marketing companies.

Request Free Review

Scores reflect technical transparency observations only. They are not legal advice or formal compliance determinations.

Scoring Method

Consent Mechanism
25 points
User Choice & Control
15 points
Cookie Categorisation
15 points
Technical Loading Behaviour
15 points
Cookie Policy Quality
10 points
Banner Wording
10 points
UX & Accessibility
10 points
Total
100 points

MJS Media

Rank #1 • Strong Consent Controls

84/100 — Strong Transparency

Clear accept/reject/preference style controls observed, giving visitors a stronger level of visible choice.

Consent Mechanism22/25
User Choice & Control14/15
Cookie Categorisation13/15
Technical Loading Behaviour13/15
Cookie Policy Quality9/10
Banner Wording7/10
UX & Accessibility6/10
  • Clear user choice controls observed.
  • Reject and preference options appear prominent.
  • Good example of modern consent presentation.
Visit Website →

KAP SEO Services

Rank #2 • Good Implementation

78/100 — Good Implementation

Policy wording indicates accept/reject controls for non-essential cookies through the site banner.

Consent Mechanism20/25
User Choice & Control13/15
Cookie Categorisation12/15
Technical Loading Behaviour11/15
Cookie Policy Quality9/10
Banner Wording7/10
UX & Accessibility6/10
  • Accept/reject wording appears clearer than average.
  • Cookie policy structure is comparatively strong.
  • Technical script-loading behaviour should still be checked periodically.
Visit Website →

Atomic Digital Marketing

Rank #3 • Strong User Choice

76/100 — Good Implementation

Visible manage preferences, reject and accept controls appear to provide a modern consent pathway.

Consent Mechanism19/25
User Choice & Control13/15
Cookie Categorisation11/15
Technical Loading Behaviour10/15
Cookie Policy Quality9/10
Banner Wording8/10
UX & Accessibility6/10
  • Strong visible choice structure.
  • Preference management appears available.
  • Good UX compared with older implied-consent banners.
Visit Website →

Hallam

Rank #4 • Agency Transparency Review

74/100 — Good Implementation

Established agency example where consent transparency, cookie categories and user choice should be maintained carefully.

Consent Mechanism18/25
User Choice & Control12/15
Cookie Categorisation12/15
Technical Loading Behaviour11/15
Cookie Policy Quality9/10
Banner Wording7/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Good implementation profile.
  • Clearer than average policy expectations.
  • Ongoing monitoring recommended due to marketing technology use.
Visit Website →

Croud

Rank #5 • Marketing Technology Review

73/100 — Good Implementation

Digital marketing business where robust tracking transparency and consent records are especially important.

Consent Mechanism18/25
User Choice & Control12/15
Cookie Categorisation12/15
Technical Loading Behaviour11/15
Cookie Policy Quality8/10
Banner Wording7/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Good transparency profile.
  • Marketing-tag environment requires regular review.
  • Clear visitor choice should be maintained.
Visit Website →

Impression Digital

Rank #6 • Agency Consent Review

72/100 — Good Implementation

Larger digital agency example with stronger apparent transparency expectations and clearer policy presentation.

Consent Mechanism18/25
User Choice & Control12/15
Cookie Categorisation12/15
Technical Loading Behaviour11/15
Cookie Policy Quality8/10
Banner Wording6/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Generally stronger implementation profile.
  • Policy structure appears more mature.
  • Periodic tracking and consent review still recommended.
Visit Website →

Found

Rank #7 • Search Agency Review

71/100 — Good Implementation

Search and performance marketing website where consent mode, analytics and third-party tags should be clearly governed.

Consent Mechanism17/25
User Choice & Control12/15
Cookie Categorisation11/15
Technical Loading Behaviour11/15
Cookie Policy Quality8/10
Banner Wording7/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Good overall implementation profile.
  • Ongoing consent-mode review recommended.
  • Cookie policy should remain current.
Visit Website →

Click Consult

Rank #8 • PPC & SEO Review

70/100 — Good Implementation

PPC and SEO agency where strong consent controls are particularly important due to likely analytics and advertising tags.

Consent Mechanism17/25
User Choice & Control12/15
Cookie Categorisation11/15
Technical Loading Behaviour11/15
Cookie Policy Quality8/10
Banner Wording6/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Marketing technology use makes consent controls important.
  • Good implementation profile overall.
  • Ongoing cookie category review recommended.
Visit Website →

The SEO Works

Rank #9 • SEO Agency Review

69/100 — Fair, Improvements Recommended

SEO agency profile where tracking transparency and cookie categorisation should be kept clear for visitors.

Consent Mechanism16/25
User Choice & Control11/15
Cookie Categorisation11/15
Technical Loading Behaviour10/15
Cookie Policy Quality8/10
Banner Wording7/10
UX & Accessibility6/10
  • Reasonable transparency profile.
  • Cookie categorisation should remain clear.
  • Consent behaviour should be periodically checked.
Visit Website →

Key Principles

Rank #10 • Analytics & Tagging Review

68/100 — Fair, Improvements Recommended

Website references analytics and tag-management activity, making consent-mode and script-loading controls important to review.

Consent Mechanism16/25
User Choice & Control11/15
Cookie Categorisation11/15
Technical Loading Behaviour10/15
Cookie Policy Quality9/10
Banner Wording6/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Analytics and tag-management relevance identified.
  • Policy clarity appears stronger than some examples.
  • Technical loading behaviour should be checked.
Visit Website →

PushON

Rank #11 • Digital Agency Review

67/100 — Fair, Improvements Recommended

Digital agency example where ecommerce, analytics and marketing tags make consent controls commercially important.

Consent Mechanism16/25
User Choice & Control11/15
Cookie Categorisation10/15
Technical Loading Behaviour10/15
Cookie Policy Quality8/10
Banner Wording6/10
UX & Accessibility6/10
  • Consent presentation appears moderate.
  • Technical tag behaviour should be checked.
  • Preference controls should be easy to find.
Visit Website →

Utilize

Rank #12 • Mixed Consent Presentation

66/100 — Fair, Improvements Recommended

Consent controls appear available, but wording and presentation may still benefit from clearer modernisation.

Consent Mechanism16/25
User Choice & Control11/15
Cookie Categorisation10/15
Technical Loading Behaviour10/15
Cookie Policy Quality8/10
Banner Wording6/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Consent controls appear present.
  • Wording could be clearer and more explicit.
  • Preference and reject labelling should be reviewed.
Visit Website →

Rise at Seven

Rank #13 • SEO & Creative Review

65/100 — Fair, Improvements Recommended

SEO and creative agency where tracking transparency should be clear, especially around analytics and campaign measurement.

Consent Mechanism15/25
User Choice & Control10/15
Cookie Categorisation10/15
Technical Loading Behaviour10/15
Cookie Policy Quality8/10
Banner Wording6/10
UX & Accessibility6/10
  • Fair transparency profile.
  • More detailed cookie categorisation may help.
  • Technical tracking review recommended.
Visit Website →

Reboot Online

Rank #14 • SEO Agency Review

64/100 — Fair, Improvements Recommended

SEO agency example where visitor tracking, analytics and cookie policy wording should be kept especially transparent.

Consent Mechanism15/25
User Choice & Control10/15
Cookie Categorisation10/15
Technical Loading Behaviour10/15
Cookie Policy Quality8/10
Banner Wording6/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Fair implementation profile.
  • Preference controls should remain prominent.
  • Tracking transparency review recommended.
Visit Website →

Blue Array

Rank #15 • SEO Consultancy Review

63/100 — Fair, Improvements Recommended

SEO consultancy profile where analytics transparency and user controls are key areas for review.

Consent Mechanism15/25
User Choice & Control10/15
Cookie Categorisation10/15
Technical Loading Behaviour9/15
Cookie Policy Quality8/10
Banner Wording6/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Fair transparency profile.
  • Cookie policy should explain analytics clearly.
  • Preference controls should remain accessible.
Visit Website →

Digitali

Rank #16 • Legacy Wording Review

62/100 — Fair, Improvements Recommended

Some consent controls appear visible, but the language and button wording could be more transparent.

Consent Mechanism15/25
User Choice & Control11/15
Cookie Categorisation9/15
Technical Loading Behaviour9/15
Cookie Policy Quality8/10
Banner Wording5/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Some user choice functionality appears present.
  • Button wording may benefit from clearer labels.
  • Improved cookie categorisation would strengthen transparency.
Visit Website →

Cedarwood Digital

Rank #17 • Digital Agency Review

61/100 — Fair, Improvements Recommended

Digital marketing website where consent wording, cookie categories and tracking disclosures may benefit from periodic review.

Consent Mechanism14/25
User Choice & Control10/15
Cookie Categorisation9/15
Technical Loading Behaviour9/15
Cookie Policy Quality8/10
Banner Wording6/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Moderate implementation profile.
  • Cookie categories could be clearer.
  • Tracking transparency should be reviewed.
Visit Website →

Addictive Digital

Rank #18 • Partial User Choice

60/100 — Fair, Improvements Recommended

Banner controls appear present, though the overall structure could better explain consent and tracking choices.

Consent Mechanism14/25
User Choice & Control10/15
Cookie Categorisation9/15
Technical Loading Behaviour9/15
Cookie Policy Quality8/10
Banner Wording5/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Some consent controls visible.
  • Clearer reject option recommended.
  • Policy and banner wording could be tightened.
Visit Website →

Absolute Digital Media

Rank #19 • Performance Agency Review

59/100 — Fair, Improvements Recommended

Performance marketing agency where visitor transparency around analytics and advertising cookies is commercially important.

Consent Mechanism14/25
User Choice & Control9/15
Cookie Categorisation9/15
Technical Loading Behaviour9/15
Cookie Policy Quality8/10
Banner Wording5/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Fair but improvable profile.
  • Consent controls should be reviewed.
  • Technical loading behaviour should be checked.
Visit Website →

Net Sixty Six

Rank #20 • Accept & Close Style Wording

47/100 — Limited Consent Controls

Older accept/close style consent wording may limit user understanding of available tracking choices.

Consent Mechanism9/25
User Choice & Control6/15
Cookie Categorisation7/15
Technical Loading Behaviour8/15
Cookie Policy Quality7/10
Banner Wording5/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Accept/close style wording observed.
  • Preference controls could be clearer.
  • Tracking transparency review recommended.
Visit Website →

Wombat Creative

Rank #21 • Older Banner Wording

46/100 — Limited Consent Controls

Digital marketing website using older consent phrasing that may benefit from clearer visitor choice controls.

Consent Mechanism9/25
User Choice & Control5/15
Cookie Categorisation7/15
Technical Loading Behaviour7/15
Cookie Policy Quality7/10
Banner Wording6/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Older-style wording observed.
  • Clearer reject and preference options recommended.
  • Cookie categories could be made more visible.
Visit Website →

AgentPro

Rank #22 • Legacy Consent Wording

45/100 — Limited Consent Controls

Older implied-consent style wording appears visible, with limited clarity around reject and preference controls.

Consent Mechanism9/25
User Choice & Control5/15
Cookie Categorisation7/15
Technical Loading Behaviour7/15
Cookie Policy Quality7/10
Banner Wording5/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Legacy wording observed.
  • Explicit user choice could be improved.
  • Modern consent banner recommended.
Visit Website →

Vizion Online

Rank #23 • Older Implied Consent Wording

44/100 — Limited Consent Controls

Older implied-consent wording was observed, with visitor choice controls not clearly prominent from the visible wording.

Consent Mechanism8/25
User Choice & Control5/15
Cookie Categorisation7/15
Technical Loading Behaviour7/15
Cookie Policy Quality7/10
Banner Wording5/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Implied-consent style wording observed.
  • Reject controls not clearly highlighted.
  • Modern accept/reject/preference banner recommended.
Visit Website →

Air Social

Rank #24 • Older Cookie Wording

43/100 — Limited Consent Controls

Older implied-consent wording appears visible, with modern reject/preference controls not clearly prominent.

Consent Mechanism8/25
User Choice & Control5/15
Cookie Categorisation7/15
Technical Loading Behaviour7/15
Cookie Policy Quality7/10
Banner Wording4/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Older wording observed.
  • Choice mechanism could be more prominent.
  • Reject and manage-preferences controls recommended.
Visit Website →

Social Ant

Rank #25 • Social Media Agency Review

42/100 — Limited Consent Controls

Social media marketing website with legacy-style implied-consent wording requiring clearer visitor choice.

Consent Mechanism8/25
User Choice & Control5/15
Cookie Categorisation6/15
Technical Loading Behaviour7/15
Cookie Policy Quality7/10
Banner Wording4/10
UX & Accessibility5/10
  • Legacy implied-consent wording visible.
  • Consent controls could be clearer.
  • Modernised banner recommended.
Visit Website →