CookieBanner.co.uk · Public Visibility Review
PRH Solicitors Cookie Notice & Privacy Signals Review
A public review of visible cookie controls, privacy wording and public data-collection journeys on the PRH Solicitors website.
Checked
27 June 2026
Review type
Public Visibility Check
Website
Scope
Visible Public Signals
VISUAL UPDATE · 27 SEPTEMBER 2026
PRH Solicitors — screenshot evidence
These screenshots show the website as it appeared on 27 September 2026. The June findings and score remain as published; we update the review when new evidence or feedback supports a change.
Following Personal Law from the landing page reveals Cookie Settings and Accept All. Settings displays Necessary as Always Enabled and five optional categories as Disabled, with Save & Accept. These labels do not establish the actual storage or tag behaviour.
Capture limits: The browser state was not reset before these captures, so they do not establish a fresh-visitor experience. This visual update did not test cookies, browser storage, network activity, Google consent signals or whether choices persist. A visible control or policy statement does not establish its technical effect.
Review findings
Visible Consent and Privacy Signals
Cookie Notice
- Cookie wording visible in public page material
- “Accept All” action identified
- “Cookie Settings” wording identified
- “Manage consent” wording identified
- Separate first-layer reject control not identified in this review
The public material suggests that visitors can access a settings route. This review did not test the settings interface or its available options.
Privacy & Cookie Wording
- Privacy & Cookie Policy publicly accessible
- Policy refers to website-access and website-use information
- PHP session cookie described
- Google Analytics referred to as a third-party cookie service
- Policy also states that no personal information is collected
The combination of these statements creates a useful clarity point: visitors may benefit from a clearer explanation of the nature of analytics and online-identification data collected or used.
Public Data Collection
- Public contact journey identified
- Name, email and subject fields visible in public contact material
- Privacy-policy route identified near the contact journey
- Inline notice placement was not fully assessed
This review does not assess backend handling, retention, lawful basis, access controls or client-file data processing.
Evidence matrix
Observed Evidence and Review Boundaries
| Review area | What was observed | Review status | Not determined by this check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cookie message | Public material displayed cookie wording with “Accept All”, “Cookie Settings” and “Manage consent” wording. | Observed | Whether the notice reflects or controls the loading of technologies. |
| Visitor choice | A settings route was visibly referenced. A separate first-layer reject option was not identified in material reviewed. | Partially evidenced | The exact controls available within the settings route, including any reject-all or category controls. |
| Privacy information | Privacy & Cookie Policy accessible and refers to a session cookie and Google Analytics. | Observed | Accuracy, legal adequacy or completeness of the policy. |
| Public forms | Public contact fields and a privacy-policy route were identified. | Observed | Backend data handling, storage, retention, records or lawful basis. |
| Cookies and tags | Not technically inspected in this public visibility review. | Not tested | Cookies, browser storage, network requests, Google Analytics behaviour, advertising pixels or Consent Mode behaviour. |
What a Deeper Review Would Check
The publicly visible wording and settings route are not enough on their own to establish how the website behaves. A technical review would create a clean-browser baseline and compare cookies, browser storage, network requests and visible page changes before interaction, after acceptance and after any refusal or category selection available in the settings route.
For a legal-services website, it would also be useful to check that cookie information, analytics disclosures, contact-form wording and live consent behaviour tell a consistent story to website visitors. This page does not attribute any technology to the site without technical evidence.
Suggested technical scope
- Clean-browser baseline
- Cookie and browser-storage review
- Network-request and tag-firing review
- Review of Cookie Settings options
- Acceptance and rejection journey comparison
- Developer-ready action list
Request an Update or Correction
PRH Solicitors, or someone authorised to act for the business, may submit evidence that this review is inaccurate, incomplete or out of date. We will consider relevant information and update the page where appropriate.
Factual corrections and updates are not conditional on purchasing any service.
For other website owners
Need a similar review?
Run a free WordPress CookieBanner Check or request a detailed technical review of consent controls, tracking tags and policy signals.
Leave a Reply