COOKIEBANNER

PRH Solicitors Cookie Banner & Tracking Review

CookieBanner.co.uk · Public Visibility Review

PRH Solicitors Cookie Notice & Privacy Signals Review

A public review of visible cookie controls, privacy wording and public data-collection journeys on the PRH Solicitors website.

Checked

27 June 2026

Review type

Public Visibility Check

Website

prhsolicitors.co.uk

Scope

Visible Public Signals

69out of 100

Visible settings route, with a policy-clarity review point

Public material reviewed showed an “Accept All” action together with “Cookie Settings” and “Manage consent” wording. The published Privacy & Cookie Policy also describes website-access information, a session cookie and Google Analytics. A useful next step would be to confirm that the policy wording, live preference controls and any analytics behaviour align clearly for visitors.

Technical tag behaviour not tested

Privacy information

25 / 25

A public Privacy & Cookie Policy was accessible from the website.

Cookie choices

14 / 25

“Accept All” and “Cookie Settings” wording were visible; a separate first-layer reject route was not identified in material reviewed.

Cookie information

15 / 15

The published policy refers to a PHP session cookie and Google Analytics.

Form transparency

6 / 15

A public contact journey and a privacy-policy route were identified; inline wording was not fully assessed.

Choice persistence

9 / 20

“Manage consent” wording was visible; operation of the settings route was not technically tested.

Why the score is 69, not a compliance verdict
The score reflects what was visibly evidenced in this public review. It gives credit for accessible privacy information, visible settings wording and published cookie information, but gives fewer points where a first-layer refusal route, preference-centre detail and ongoing choice controls were not fully evidenced. It is not a legal conclusion.
What was directly visible in this check
Public material displayed cookie wording referring to visitor experience, preferences and repeat visits, with “Accept All”, “Cookie Settings” and “Manage consent” wording. The Privacy & Cookie Policy states that no personal information is collected, while also explaining that information is collected about how users access and use the website. It also refers to a PHP session cookie and Google Analytics.
What this check did not test
This public check did not inspect browser storage, cookies, network requests, tag-manager settings, analytics or advertising pixels. It did not determine which controls appear inside the Cookie Settings route, how technologies operate before or after a visitor selection, or whether different visitor states display additional controls.
Important: This is a Public Visibility & Transparency Score based on observed public evidence. It is not a GDPR, PECR, legal or formal compliance score, and it does not determine how scripts, cookies, pixels or tags operate in every consent state.

Review findings

Visible Consent and Privacy Signals

Cookie Notice

  • Cookie wording visible in public page material
  • “Accept All” action identified
  • “Cookie Settings” wording identified
  • “Manage consent” wording identified
  • Separate first-layer reject control not identified in this review

The public material suggests that visitors can access a settings route. This review did not test the settings interface or its available options.

Privacy & Cookie Wording

  • Privacy & Cookie Policy publicly accessible
  • Policy refers to website-access and website-use information
  • PHP session cookie described
  • Google Analytics referred to as a third-party cookie service
  • Policy also states that no personal information is collected

The combination of these statements creates a useful clarity point: visitors may benefit from a clearer explanation of the nature of analytics and online-identification data collected or used.

Public Data Collection

  • Public contact journey identified
  • Name, email and subject fields visible in public contact material
  • Privacy-policy route identified near the contact journey
  • Inline notice placement was not fully assessed

This review does not assess backend handling, retention, lawful basis, access controls or client-file data processing.

Evidence matrix

Observed Evidence and Review Boundaries

Review areaWhat was observedReview statusNot determined by this check
Cookie messagePublic material displayed cookie wording with “Accept All”, “Cookie Settings” and “Manage consent” wording.ObservedWhether the notice reflects or controls the loading of technologies.
Visitor choiceA settings route was visibly referenced. A separate first-layer reject option was not identified in material reviewed.Partially evidencedThe exact controls available within the settings route, including any reject-all or category controls.
Privacy informationPrivacy & Cookie Policy accessible and refers to a session cookie and Google Analytics.ObservedAccuracy, legal adequacy or completeness of the policy.
Public formsPublic contact fields and a privacy-policy route were identified.ObservedBackend data handling, storage, retention, records or lawful basis.
Cookies and tagsNot technically inspected in this public visibility review.Not testedCookies, browser storage, network requests, Google Analytics behaviour, advertising pixels or Consent Mode behaviour.

What a Deeper Review Would Check

The publicly visible wording and settings route are not enough on their own to establish how the website behaves. A technical review would create a clean-browser baseline and compare cookies, browser storage, network requests and visible page changes before interaction, after acceptance and after any refusal or category selection available in the settings route.

For a legal-services website, it would also be useful to check that cookie information, analytics disclosures, contact-form wording and live consent behaviour tell a consistent story to website visitors. This page does not attribute any technology to the site without technical evidence.

Suggested technical scope

  • Clean-browser baseline
  • Cookie and browser-storage review
  • Network-request and tag-firing review
  • Review of Cookie Settings options
  • Acceptance and rejection journey comparison
  • Developer-ready action list

Request an Update or Correction

PRH Solicitors, or someone authorised to act for the business, may submit evidence that this review is inaccurate, incomplete or out of date. We will consider relevant information and update the page where appropriate.

Factual corrections and updates are not conditional on purchasing any service.

Request Review Update

For other website owners

Need a similar review?

Run a free WordPress CookieBanner Check or request a detailed technical review of consent controls, tracking tags and policy signals.

Run a Free WordPress Check

admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *