CookieBanner.co.uk · Fresh Public Visibility Review

Taylors Estate Agents
Cookie Banner & Tracking Review

A structured review of visible consent choices, privacy information and public data-collection journeys.

Reviewed

21 June 2026

Review type

Public Visibility Check

Scope

Visible Public Signals

92out of 100

Strong visible consent journey

The first-view banner presents distinct routes to accept all cookies, reject non-essential cookies, manage preferences and open the Cookie Policy.

Technical consent behaviour not tested

Privacy information

25 / 25

Public privacy information was easy to locate.

Cookie choices

25 / 25

Accept, reject and preference routes were visible.

Cookie information

15 / 15

Cookie Policy was visible in the banner.

Form transparency

15 / 15

Privacy and marketing wording was visible in public form flows.

Choice persistence

12 / 20

Preferences visible; reopening and effect after dismissal were not tested.

Why the score is 92, not 100
The visible first-view consent journey scored strongly. Eight points are held back because this public check did not test whether a visitor can re-open choices after closing the banner, nor whether preference changes alter browser storage, cookie setting or tag firing.
How the score is calculated
The score has five visibility categories: public privacy information (25), visible cookie choices (25), accessible cookie information (15), public form transparency (15), and visible ability to revisit choices (20). It measures public presentation only, not legal compliance or technical performance.
What a technical follow-up would test
A deeper check would use a clean-browser baseline and compare network requests, browser storage, cookies and visible page changes before consent, after accepting, after rejecting non-essential cookies and after changing preferences.
Important: This is a Public Visibility & Transparency Score based on observed public evidence. It is not a GDPR, PECR, legal or formal compliance score, and it does not determine how scripts, cookies, pixels or tags operate in every consent state.

Review findings

What Was Clearly Visible

Consent Banner

  • “Accept all” option visible
  • “Reject non-essential” option visible
  • “Preferences” route visible
  • Cookie Policy link visible

These controls were visible on the first-view homepage banner during the review.

Privacy and Enquiry Journeys

  • Privacy-policy route visible from public site content
  • Contact, valuation, callback and viewing-request journeys visible
  • Public forms request visitor contact information
  • Privacy and marketing wording appears in public form journeys

Focused Point for Further Review

Some public contact forms present privacy acknowledgement and marketing-communications wording within a required consent field. This review does not determine whether that wording or configuration meets any legal standard, but it is a sensible item for the business and its privacy adviser to review separately.

Evidence matrix

Observed Evidence and Review Boundaries

Review areaWhat was observedReview statusNot determined by this check
Visitor consentAccept all, Reject non-essential, Preferences and Cookie Policy were visible in the homepage banner.ObservedWhether all associated technologies respect each choice.
Privacy informationPrivacy-policy links and privacy wording were visible in public content.ObservedAccuracy, completeness and legal adequacy of the policy.
Public formsForms collect contact details and include privacy and marketing wording.ObservedBackend data handling, retention, records or lawful basis.
Cookies and tagsNot technically inspected in this public visibility review.Not testedCookies, browser storage, network requests, analytics tags, advertising pixels or Consent Mode behaviour.
Ongoing preferencesPreferences route was visible from the first-view banner.Partially observedWhether visitors can later reopen and change choices after dismissal.

Review Method and Limits

This review is based on visible public page content and the first-view consent banner observed during a fresh visit. It does not access any private administrative systems, consent-platform accounts, analytics accounts, tag managers, visitor records or server-side configuration.

Website content and technical configuration can change. The page therefore records a dated snapshot rather than a permanent assessment.

Recommended technical follow-up

  • Clean-browser baseline
  • Accept / reject / preferences comparison
  • Cookie and browser-storage review
  • Network-request and tag-firing review
  • Documented developer action list

Request an Update or Correction

Taylors Estate Agents, or someone authorised to act for the business, may submit evidence that this review is inaccurate, incomplete or out of date. We will consider relevant information and update the page where appropriate.

Factual corrections and updates are not conditional on purchasing any service.

For other website owners

Need a similar review?

Run a free WordPress CookieBanner Check or request a detailed technical review of consent controls, tracking tags and policy signals.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *